Study: 100-Foot Buffers Keep Streams Healthy

July 2, 2014

AVONDALE, Pa., June 17, 2014 — Streamside forest buffers, long considered a best management practice, should be at least 100 feet wide on each side to adequately protect freshwater ecosystems from human activities according to an extensive scientific literature review published in the June issue of Journal of American Water Resources Association.

“That’s a lot. We know it’s a lot. But this is what the science is saying, and the reward for a wide forest buffer is huge,” said study author Bernard W. Sweeney, Ph.D., director of the Stroud Water Research Center.

While the environmental benefits of streamside forest buffers have been known for decades, there was no consensus about how wide an effective forest buffer should be, until now.  Current standards for a minimum forest buffer width vary from state to state and even from program to program, ranging from 35 feet to 100 feet.

The ecosystem benefits of wider forest buffers for streams include nitrogen pollution removal, soil sediment trapping, bank erosion prevention, improved temperature control, increased quantity of large woody debris, stream channel widening, improved channel meandering, and healthier habitat for macroinvertebrates and fish. Meadows and grass buffers do not provide as many benefits.

“Most pollutants enter river systems in small streams, narrow enough to jump across.  So it’s vitally important that we protect their function,” said study co-author J. Denis Newbold, Ph.D., a specialist in ecosystem processes at Stroud Water Research Center. Newbold explained that since small freshwater systems constitute 85 percent or more of the total stream miles in the world, they are more commonly in direct contact with human sources of pollution than are larger freshwater streams, such as large creeks and rivers.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency reported in 2013 that more than half of the river and stream miles in the United States are in poor condition and no longer able to support natural aquatic life or designated use by humans.

Sweeney and Newbold concluded that their review underscores the important role streamside forests play in protecting and enhancing water quality of downstream rivers and estuaries by providing important services, such as: sequestering carbon, metabolizing organic matter and degrading and processing pollutants.

Replanting forests in previously cleared land is a key component of Stroud Water Research Center’s Watershed Restoration Team which helps farmers and landowner’s access state and federal incentives that offset the costs of making improvements and keeping the land in its natural state.

Matt Ehrhart, director of watershed restoration at Stroud Water Research Center, said: “While not every farmer and landowner we work with will be able to accommodate a 100-foot wide forest buffer, citing this study enables us convey the importance of forest buffers and perhaps persuade landowners to establish wider forest buffers than they might previously have considered.”

About Stroud Water Research Center

Stroud Water Research Center seeks to advance knowledge and stewardship of fresh water through research, education, watershed restoration and global outreach to help businesses, landowners, policy-makers, and individuals make informed decisions that affect water quality and availability around the world. Stroud Water Research Center is an independent, 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. For more information, please visit www.stroudcenter.org.

Photo 39297166 © Mike2focus | Dreamstime.com
Photo 140820417 © Susanne Fritzsche | Dreamstime.com
Microplastics that were fragmented from larger plastics are called secondary microplastics; they are known as primary microplastics if they originate from small size produced industrial beads, care products or textile fibers.
Photo 43114609 © Joshua Gagnon | Dreamstime.com
Dreamstime Xxl 43114609