Green and gray infrastructure integration changes stormwater engineering
Green infrastructure has become a standard expectation in stormwater planning. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has compiled a compendium of MS4 permitting approaches that require green infrastructure using specific, measurable permit terms and conditions. Some permits require measurable water quality improvements where stormwater discharges to impaired water bodies with an approved total maximum daily load.
The engineering challenge, according to Nick Anderson, a vice president at Stantec and the firm's North America sector leader for stormwater management, collection systems, and combined sewer overflows, is that green and gray infrastructure do not naturally cooperate.
"Green infrastructure is no longer an optional enhancement but a core tool for resilience, regulatory compliance, and system performance," Anderson wrote in a recent piece for Wastewater Digest.
The two approaches manage wet weather in opposing hydraulic directions. Gray infrastructure, which includes pipes, pump stations, and storage tanks, moves water through a collection system as efficiently as possible during large storm events. Green infrastructure intercepts runoff at the surface before it enters a pipe, slowing and reducing the flow. Anderson notes green solutions perform most reliably during smaller, more frequent storms, while gray infrastructure is built to handle extreme events. A detention pond releasing water at the wrong rate, for instance, can create peak flow timing problems downstream in a gray system designed around different assumptions.
Modeling has become more complicated
Hydraulic modeling software has adapted to reflect this complexity. Several commercial platforms now include green infrastructure components that simulate the hydrologic and hydraulic characteristics of individual structures alongside gray components, meaning engineers can model a rain garden or similar installation with the same tool they use for a pipe network.
Anderson draws a distinction that matters for planning teams: deterministic models, which apply rainfall directly to a two-dimensional surface mesh built from a digital terrain model, are more accurate but significantly more data-intensive than probabilistic sewer models. They can better represent runoff routing and infiltration parameters, but the tradeoff is calibration complexity.
Utilities with an existing calibrated probabilistic hydraulic model should not assume it extends cleanly to green infrastructure additions. Anderson cautions that incorporating green infrastructure components can invalidate existing calibration parameters, requiring engineers to revisit and recalibrate before outputs can be trusted.
Monitoring is part of the commitment
Modeling alone does not confirm performance. Anderson outlines three approaches utilities use to track integrated systems: direct flow monitoring upstream and downstream of green infrastructure; event-based tracking of combined sewer overflow volumes, durations, and frequencies; and model-monitor reconciliation, which blends Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition system observations with hydraulic model predictions.
Under some MS4 permits, the EPA requires specific and measurable water quality improvements where stormwater discharges to impaired water bodies with an approved total maximum daily load. The EPA has cataloged consent decrees that include green infrastructure provisions and consent decree language addressing green-for-gray substitutions, reflecting how frequently the two systems are now being planned together.
Anderson also points to emerging SCADA testbeds that can simulate decentralized system behavior and evaluate control logic for green operations, including release rates and smart valve positions. Several utilities are already running SCADA testbeds outside of research settings.
Green infrastructure at the scale regulators now require is an engineering commitment, not a landscaping decision.
The article referenced in this story originally ran as Blending gray and green infrastructure for improved collection system performance on Wastewater Digest, an Endeavor Business Media partner site.
About the Author
Sarah Kominek
Head of Content, Stormwater Solutions
Sarah Kominek is the head of content for Stormwater Solutions at Endeavor Business Media, a division of EndeavorB2B. Kominek graduated from Wayne State University in 2019 with a Bachelor of Arts in Journalism and a minor in Communication. She worked as a reporter for Plastics News, a Crain Communications publication, for six years covering public policy and medical plastics.

